Hey Matt, thanks for your feedback!

Straight answer: you can't white-label that delivery email today. The Proposal itself will carry your branding if you upload your logo under Company Settings → Logo, it shows up on your customer-facing outputs (here's the how-to), but the wrapper around it is still ours.

Here's a workaround that gets you close in the meantime:

Send it from your own inbox. Open the Proposal, grab the share link or download it as a PDF, and send it from your company email with your own signature and message. Your customer gets a proposal from you, in your voice, and the link still tracks and collects signatures the same way.

We can totally see how you'd want to keep it all within CompanyCam from beginning to end, so I'd be happy to pass your request along to the team that owns Proposals.

Megan M. said:

Hey Lee, this is a great callout and you're reading the situation exactly right.

Adding Fields and Sections to a Checklist that's already live on a Project isn't something you can do directly in the app (or over MCP) today. That's a known gap, and it's actively being worked on right now!

The good news: there's already a way to do this. The CompanyCam Assistant can add, edit, and discard Sections, Fields, and conditional follow-ups on an existing Advanced Checklist, not just Templates. So instead of duplicating or deleting your way around it, you can pull up the Checklist and tell the Assistant what you need added, conditional logic included. It can also build a brand-new one-off Checklist from scratch with no Template at all, refine it as you go, and complete items (text and photos). Worth trying on a live Checklist and seeing how close it gets you.

On your bigger question: one-off Advanced Checklists in the UI are being built as we speak. I can't put a date on it, but that's the direction — the Assistant just got there first.

It's worth flagging that "derive from a template, then edit the instance" is the specific part I want to make sure the team hears, because it's a little different from "build a one-off from nothing." I'm passing your post along with that framing. Feedback like this is genuinely what shapes the order things get built in, so thank you for taking the time to write it up.

Click to expand...

This is great to hear. thank you so much.

Hey James, thanks for the feedback!

There's no native crew calendar in CompanyCam today, as you know, but you're far from the only one asking. This is easily one of the most requested things we hear, so I've passed your write-up along to our product team. It's an area we're actively digging into right now, though I can't give you a timeline on what lands or when.

In the meantime, here's the closest thing to what you're describing, and it gets you further than a group text:

Assign users to the Project. Open the Project → Project Users → Assign Users. Everyone assigned gets a notification that drops them right into the job, and it shows up in their Projects list on mobile. (How to assign a Project to Users)

Use the Google Calendar integration for the "when." It's two-way — you can create a CompanyCam Project straight from a Google Calendar event. If your office schedules the week on a shared work calendar, the jobs get built in CompanyCam automatically and your team taps the Project link from the event to land on-site with everything already there. (Setup guide)

Assign the work. Project Tasks live in the To-Dos tab and can be assigned to specific people — crews see everything assigned to them in My Stuff, across every job. (Assign Project Tasks to Users) Checklists can be assigned the same way if you've got a repeatable scope. (Assign a Checklist to Users)

Thank you again for sharing this and what you want it to look like!

The duplicating is not a bad workaround. I'm not crazy about having duplicate photos, but it does work well and it pretty easy to do. Thank you for the tip!

Hey Sharee! Good news — you can absolutely do this today.

Here's how it works: an Admin or Manager connects the Google Drive integration, and CompanyCam automatically creates a CompanyCam root folder in that person's My Drive. From there, every new Project gets its own subfolder, and all photos, videos, and documents sync into it automatically.

The part you're after: once that root folder exists, you can move it straight into your company's Shared Drive. Just right-click the CompanyCam folder in Drive → Organize → Move → pick your Shared Drive. Sync keeps running exactly as before, and now your whole team has access based on your Shared Drive permissions.

Two quick tips so it goes smoothly:

• Have an Admin be the one to connect it, since whoever connects it owns that root folder.
• Connect first, then move — the folder has to exist before you can relocate it.

Full walkthrough is here: Integrate CompanyCam and Google Drive

One thing that isn't possible currently is picking the Shared Drive (or a specific customer folder) as the destination during setup. It's always "connect, then move." We have a feature request for this that I'll tag you to and we'll chime back in here if there is any progress in the future!

Hey Casey, you're speaking our language — nobody should have to click into 30 Projects to figure out where each one stands.

Are you referring to viewing Labels in the mobile app? Good news on the mobile side: we've been working on a redesigned Project Feed that includes putting Labels right on the Project cards. It's making its way to accounts now, so if you're not seeing it yet, hang tight — and make sure you're on the latest app version.

A workaround in the meantime: you can filter by Label by tapping the Search Icon in the bottom left of your mobile home screen > scroll through the tabs and tap Labels > search for the Label you'd like to narrow your Projects down by.

Showing more Labels on cards is something we're already poking at, so this lands at a good time. Thanks for taking the time to write this up!

Hey there! This is a fantastic idea, and that mockup made it really easy to picture.

The live camera overlay with a Maps-style navigation indicator isn't something we can do today. But the foundation you're describing — uploading a plan and pinning photos to exact spots on it — is something our team is actively tinkering with right now. I can't make any promises, but feedback like this helps shape what we build next, so thank you for taking the time to write it up.

In the meantime, here are a couple of things that get you partway there:

Map This Photo might be the closest thing to what you're after. Open a photo, tap the Map Icon, and you'll see a pin for where it was taken plus the direction the photographer was facing. That's the "which way was this shot looking?" piece you mentioned, just on a satellite map instead of over the drawing. Here's how it works.

Turn on GPS + date/time stamps so every photo carries its own location context for anyone reviewing later. Steps here.

Upload the drawing as a Project Document, then use Tags (or a quick annotation on a copy of the plan) to label areas — "North Elevation," "Grid C4," etc. Tag your photos to match, and someone who's never been on site can filter to an area and know exactly what they're looking at.

Draw a geofence when you create the project so photos stay tied to the right site — handy on larger jobs.

Not quite your ask, but it'll get your viewer oriented today. Keep the ideas coming!

Appreciate you writing this one up!

Right now, Reminders only offer the preset windows (30 minutes, 4 hours, 1 day, 3 days), and they're personal — you can set one on your own or someone else's comment, but it only pings you. So a "remind me on November 12th" or "remind Dave" isn't possible today.

Two workarounds that get you close in the meantime:

For follow-ups further out: assign a Project Task to a User instead of using a Reminder. Tasks stick around until they're checked off, they show up under My Stuff on the home screen, and they don't expire after 3 days.

For reminding someone else: @mention them right in the photo comment or Project Conversation.

Regarding your specific ask for these changes to reminders, I'm passing this along to our Product team. No timeline to promise you, but your feedback is absolutely landing in the right place.

Hey Sharee,

I want to be honest with you here: retroactive sync is a request we've logged and that a lot of customers have asked for, but it isn't currently scheduled or in development. I don't have a timeline or details on what it would look like if we develop it.

But here's the part I'm confident about: connect now anyway. Every day you're not connected is another day of projects joining the "needs manual work" pile. Connect today and that pile stops growing — everything from here forward handles itself. If a retro sync does ship later, you'd be in the best possible position for it. And if it doesn't, you've still got the manual download-and-upload path for the older stuff, and a much smaller backlog to chew through.

I'll keep your request attached to the internal ticket either way. Thanks!

Hey Koren!

Thanks for bringing this over here after our chat today. I've already tagged you on the feature requests for both moving Documents/Folders between Projects and bulk deleting Documents. So if either of those ships, you'll hear about it.

Straight answer on the Folder question: Folders live inside a single Project right now, so there's no way to pick one up and drop it into another Project. Same story for the PDFs inside it. Not the answer you wanted, and I'm not going to pretend the download-and-reupload route is fun.

A couple things that should actually save you time, though:

Bulk moves just got way better. As of last week you can hover any Document row, click the checkbox, and a bar pops up with a running count and a Move to Folder button. Best part — your selections stick while you search, so you can grab a few, search for more, keep adding to the same batch, and move them all in one shot. There's no true "select all" button yet, but that's actively being worked on along with a few other bulk actions.

And nice catch on the delete workaround. Dropping everything into a Folder and deleting the Folder really is the fastest way to clear a batch today — you found the shortcut!

For those PDFs in the wrong Project: download them from the Documents tab, then upload them back into the correct Project. Still a haul, but it's a one-time cleanup.

Keep the feedback coming and thanks for sticking with us on it.

Hi @haileyWRE wanted to follow up and let you know Advanced checklists are now visible in the project group overview page!

Hi Shayla,

This doesn't work.
It doesn't populate the job on the map.
Also when I click on the coordinates in the project is just pulls up a general Google Map that is near my location and no where near the actual project location.

Guys use the map in the field to bring up jobs they are near and get the correct job number to put their time to - photos to.

Example, the location I used has 2 other projects for two different clients that are all working on the same project but different phases. The correct photos need to go to the correct clients. If the project doesn't populate, the final as builts/photos, billing will all be off.

Hey there! Thanks for you feedback!

Right now, Project Tasks don't stamp who created them or when. What is tracked today is the other half of the story: when someone checks a task off, we capture who completed it and when.

A couple of things that get you close in the meantime:

• Assign the task right when you create it. The assignee gets a notification, and it shows up in their My Stuff so there's a clear owner from the jump — often that's the accountability people are actually after. Here's how.
• Use the task details field for context. We just raised the limit to 5,000 characters, so there's plenty of room if your team wants to keep noting initials for now — and it beats cramming it into the title.

None of that is the automatic timestamp you're asking for, I know. But this request is logged with our product team and tied to the same feedback we've heard from other crews.

Thank you for taking the time to post this!

Hey! Thanks for laying this out so clearly. The distinction between "who's on the job" and "who has access to the project" is a good one, and I can see why Labels feel clunky for this.

Right now there isn't a dedicated Trade Partner/Subcontractor field like the Customer field, so this isn't something you can do today. But this is genuinely useful feedback, especially the warranty use case; that's a workflow angle that's easy to miss if you're just thinking about active builds.

In the meantime, a couple of workarounds that might help:

• Project Description: drop the sub's company name, contact, and number right in there. It's plain text, so it won't be as scannable as a dedicated field, but it keeps the info attached to the project without cluttering up Labels.
• A Document on the project: if you want something more structured (multiple subs, multiple trades), a running Document with a simple table works well and stays visible to anyone with project access, including your warranty team down the line.

I'm passing this along to the product team. Feel free to add any other details here (like whether you'd want this per-project or a main director) since that kind of detail helps shape the design if it gets picked up.

Hey! Not a left-field idea at all, you're onto something we're actively digging into. We hear you on wanting more flexibility than our current four roles give you, especially for keeping Assistant automations pointed at the right people. Can't share a timeline yet, but this is being worked on, and posts like yours help us prioritize what to build first. Keep it coming!

Hey there, thanks for sharing what would make your work easier within CompanyCam!

Straight answer first: .cvj files aren't supported in Project Files just yet. Today the Documents tab accepts PDF, DOC, DOCX, XLS, XLSX, CSV, TXT, JPG, JPEG, PNG, and NUMBERS, up to 100 MB each.

Good news though — we do have a feature request logged for this exact ask, specifically calling out Cabinet Vision .cvj files. It's on our Product team's radar and I've added this thread to it. I can't promise anything, but your request is being tracked!

If anyone else in the cabinetry/millwork world is running into this same thing or recommends a workaround, feel free to chime in.

Hey, Ben! This is a great catch, and honestly a fair one.

You're right that the summary view with total hours shows up when you're looking at someone else's time, but not when you're looking at your own in My Time. That's an inconsistency, not a permissions thing, and it makes scanning your own week harder than it should be.

Good news: our Time Tracking team has this one on their radar and is actively working on bringing that same range selector and hours total over to My Time, for every role. No date to promise yet, but it's in motion!

In the meantime, the best workaround is the Time Tracking page on web. You can filter down to a date range there and see totals, plus export to CSV if you want to double-check a pay period. It's a couple of extra taps compared to just glancing at your phone, but it'll get you the same numbers until the mobile view catches up. More details here.

Thanks for taking the time to write this up so clearly — keep it coming.

Thank you, Shayla—I appreciate you passing this along to the product team.

For our workflow, the two most valuable additions would be:

1. A dedicated Project Status field.
2. Scheduled Start Date and Time and Scheduled End Time / Date fields.

These would solve two related but separate problems for companies integrating CompanyCam with Salesforce or another CRM.

Project Status

Labels can technically represent a project’s status, but they become messy very quickly. We also use labels for job type, fuel type, paperwork, routing, technician workflow, and other operational purposes. When status is mixed into the same label system, a project can accidentally have Scheduled, Completed, and Cannot Complete selected simultaneously.

A dedicated, single-value Project Status field would prevent those conflicts. Suggested values could include:

• New
• Scheduled
• In Progress
• Completed
• Incomplete
• Cannot Complete
• Waiting
• Canceled
• Closed

Ideally, companies could customize their available status values.

In our workflow, Salesforce is the main office system, and the Work Order Status controls which queues, lists, and follow-up processes contain the job. Our technicians do not have Salesforce licenses; they work from CompanyCam.

We currently rely on the technician applying a matching CompanyCam label, which triggers an integration that updates the Salesforce Work Order. It works, but labels are not the cleanest tool for this. We must determine which label represents the newest status, remove the previous status label, and prevent multiple conflicting status labels from being applied.

A dedicated field would give every project one clear, authoritative status.

Structured status values would also give CompanyCam and its customers much more automation potential. A status change could trigger:

• A webhook update to Salesforce or another CRM.
• A customer completion message.
• An office follow-up task for an incomplete job.
• A parts request when a job cannot be completed.
• A payment request when work is completed.
• Automatic project archiving after a defined period.
• Different required checklists or documents.
• Management alerts and dashboards.
• Movement between project views without creating additional labels.

Labels could then remain available for what they do best: flexible categories such as Wood, Gas, Installation, Cleaning, Warranty, or Route Stop 1. Project Status would describe where the job is in its lifecycle.

For integrations, the minimum useful Project Status implementation would include:

• One current status value per project.
• Customizable status options.
• Read and write access through the API.
• A webhook event when the status changes.
• The user and timestamp associated with the change.
• Visibility and easy editing on web and mobile.
• The ability to filter, sort, and report by status.
• Optional automations based on status changes.

Scheduled Start Date and Time and Scheduled End Time / Date

For scheduling, having both a Scheduled Start Date and Time and a Scheduled End Time / Date would be considerably more useful than having a single date or timestamp.

I would keep the scheduled appointment information separate from the actual time worked:

• Scheduled Start Date and Time
• Scheduled End Time / Date, preferably optional
• Actual Clock-In and Clock-Out through CompanyCam’s Time Tracking feature

The Scheduled End Time / Date should not automatically close the project. Project Status should control whether the project is completed, incomplete, canceled, or closed. The scheduled fields would represent the appointment or arrival window promised to the customer.

Our office schedules a Salesforce Work Order for a particular technician and date. The integration then creates the corresponding CompanyCam project. Salesforce customer information maps very well into the CompanyCam project contact, but the scheduled date and time currently have no structured destination. We can only place that information in the project description or notepad.

That technically displays the information, but it cannot be reliably sorted, filtered, reported on, displayed prominently, or used by automations without parsing free text. The schedule can also become buried among the other project notes.

Our technicians often route the next day’s jobs themselves the night before. Structured scheduling fields could allow CompanyCam to:

• Display today’s and tomorrow’s projects chronologically.
• Show the arrival window prominently on mobile project cards.
• Sort and filter projects by their scheduled date.
• Improve map and routing views.
• Notify technicians when an appointment changes.
• Send appointment reminders or arrival-window texts to customers.
• Push technician scheduling changes back to Salesforce or another CRM.
• Compare the scheduled appointment with actual Time Tracking data.
• Report on travel time, arrival accuracy, job duration, and workload.

For example, a customer could be given an appointment window of September 16 from 9:00–11:00 AM:

• Scheduled Start Date and Time: September 16 at 9:00 AM
• Scheduled End Time / Date: September 16 at 11:00 AM

For a multi-day installation, the Scheduled End Time / Date could instead fall on a later date. Companies that only need a single scheduled time could leave the ending field blank.

The existing contact integration is a good comparison. Because customer information has dedicated fields, it remains structured and useful throughout CompanyCam. We would love project status and appointment scheduling to work the same way.

The minimum useful scheduling implementation would include:

• Scheduled Start Date and Time.
• Optional Scheduled End Time / Date.
• API read and write access.
• Webhook events when either value changes.
• Web and mobile visibility.
• Visibility on mobile project cards.
• Sorting and filtering by these fields.

Together, Project Status, Scheduled Start Date and Time, Scheduled End Time / Date, and Time Tracking would provide a clean progression:

Scheduled appointment → technician arrival → work performed → final project status.

That would make CompanyCam substantially more powerful for companies using Salesforce and other CRMs without requiring CompanyCam to become a full field-service platform. It would also create a strong foundation for customer communications, routing, reporting, payments, and workflow automation.

We would be very interested in beta-testing these features with our Salesforce-to-CompanyCam integration.

Hey Matt! Good news, you can pull this off today!

Every Proposal starts with a default Terms & Conditions section (boilerplate our in-house legal team wrote). Head into the Proposal editor, scroll to Terms and Conditions, and swap that text out for your company's own. Once you edit your T&C, that version carries over to every new Proposal you create after it. So it's really a one-and-done setup — paste yours in once, and you're rolling.

Two quick heads-ups:

• It's set per user, so each person on your team building Proposals will want to paste your company's T&C in on their first one.
• Hang onto the Proposal where you first set them. If every Proposal using your custom terms gets deleted, new ones will fall back to the original stock language. (Pro tip: keep a copy of your T&C in a doc somewhere so it's an easy re-paste if you ever need it.)

Full walkthrough here: Create a Proposal

A true account-level default, where an admin sets the T&C once for the whole company, is exactly the kind of thing our team is exploring with Proposal templates. No timeline I can promise, but I'm passing this along to the Proposals crew because wishlist posts like yours are a big part of how that stuff gets prioritized.

Keep an eye on our News Center too — that's where we post updates as they ship, so you'll see it there first if this one lands.

Thanks for taking the time to write it up!

Hey, Jon!

First off, thanks for sticking with us and sharing what's needed for you and your team to get your jobs done more easily!

Good news: Folders are here. Every project now has a single Documents tab where your Pages, Files, and Reports all live together, and you can create Folders to organize them however makes sense — by visit, by property, by doc type, whatever fits your workflow. It's live on the web app and in the mobile app for everyone, so you should see it next time you open a Project. Just hit + in the Documents tab and choose Folder to get started.

On Checklists specifically — those don't live in Folders yet. You're not the only one asking, and it's something our product team is actively looking at, so I'm making sure your voice gets added to that conversation. I can't promise a timeline today, but it's on the radar!

In the meantime, a couple of things that might take some pressure off:

• Project Groups (only on specific plans) lets you bundle related projects — say every unit at one property, or every job for one client — into a single group with one dashboard showing progress across all of them. If you're managing thousands of photos across a bunch of properties, this is probably the biggest win available to you right now.
• Project Labels are great for slicing your project list by property, client, or job type, and Tags do the same thing at the photo level. Between the two, you can usually get to the right handful of photos way faster than a broad keyword search.

If you want a hand setting any of this up, our support team is at support@companycam.com and they'll walk you through it. We don't want to lose you over organization — that's a fixable problem.

Thanks again for sharing your feedback!

Thank you!

Great points. I think the labels would be helpful as well since we're unable to automatically add labels using the API before the project is created. We're still new to Company Cam and mapping out our company's use-cases. We envision archiving projects / estimates that don't turn to sales and think we'll do this daily. Hope that makes sense and thanks for the quick reply.

Hey! I'm envisioning pulling info from the CRM to create the CompanyCam invoice. That way I can have an invoice premade in CompanyCam ready to go for the PMs before they start the final walkthrough.
My CRM is already integrated with CompanyCam, so the project link is quite simple. On the scheduled install end date I would push client info, project balances, and project descriptions to CompanyCam for invoice creation.

Hey there!

This is a smart ask, and I can picture exactly why you want it. Grouping items like panels and breakers, or conduit and fittings, would make the Proposal read a lot more the way you actually think about the job.

That's not something we can do today, but I've passed it along to our product team.

No timeline on it, but keep this kind of feedback coming!

Hey there!

I hear the frustration, but I don't want you walking away thinking collaboration doesn't do anything here. Collaborators can already create, view, and complete Project Tasks today, so they're not locked out of the workflow entirely.

Fair ask on assigning them to the Task, though, and I've passed it along to our product team.

Curious what's driving this for you; is it more about assigning specific punch list items to a sub, or keeping everyone's outstanding work visible in one place? Either way, appreciate you writing it up!